I love how I'm the one who has to be brainwashed here, and it's all about what the military does. 

Something isn't moral just because you arbitrarily assign a value to it based on how it makes you feel. I'm already moral enough in the way I act since I'm defending my rights with force. That's the expense of treading on someone else. It's perfectly legal under the American system. And quite practical. I'm not going to wait for the law to punish or get justice on somebody who has already done their peace on me. The law is little help when I'm already dead by a criminal. They don't follow the law. I need extra insurance to enforce my own safety. Which is why I carry a gun with me everywhere I go, and I'm ready to use it wherever I go. I don't trust anyone. I live longer that way. You do know that at this point, you're literally inventing a position for me and assuming that I take that position. But yes, I think more people in the United States would be better off if they exercised their Constitutional right to bear arms.

If you think that one versus 28 in an economic competition is a sound source of victory, then you have a problem with math. A collective entity is always going to have more power than the singular individual state. Yet you seem to believe that makes the EU better and more successful, when in truth, it was us who invested in you and put you on track to become what you are. And singularly, none of you even touch us. Which is the point.

It's because its the best mentality to generally have for success and prominence: equality and fairness don't feel so good when you're the one suffering because of it. That's why I'm determined to not be the guy who suffers. Better someone else than me. If that's brainwashing, then fine. It's the perfect way to be. No, the entire world, in a non-nuclear conflict, would not beat us, combined. I can give you a strategic analysis of how such an event would likely occur. And it's a lot more than just 'America is awesome'. We have serious geographical and physical defenses to put us in an advantageous enough position to hold a high ground from both the North and South, and cover our maritime defenses at the coasts: as well, no other nation on Earth even begins to compare at our capability for power projection and logistical capability. To us, an ocean is easily crossed or flown over. To others, there is literally an ocean between us and you don't have the same means to cross as we do. Given our advanced technology and industry, as well as absolute dominance of the Air, Sea, and Space, there isn't much you could realistically do to push us back on those fronts over the short term.

As well, we did put up quite a decent fight on our own: we didn't have the capital or establishment to take on the English juggernaut, but we continued to push forward anyway. Afterwards, you'll have to give a period where the US lost a battle where we didn't make up for it later in the war that it was in. I'm seriously waiting for more evidence that we tactically got our asses kicked to a point where we had to get help from someone else. You haven't listed off one instance yet. So yes, we are pretty damn special. We make ourselves special. It's our individualism. It's our drive to succeed in competition of all forms. It's our desire to win at all costs and overcome all odds. It's why we've gone to the moon, to Mars, and beyond. It's why we're the global economic powerhouse and superpower that we have been and are right now.

And you're being arbitrary with how you define them (just as you are with the 'brainwashing') as the best minds in the world. You probably don't know much, if any, actual political theory (much less the scientific analysis of political trends using a STATA program). Neutrality isn't a factor here. It's simple ignorance and bad definition of terms on your part.

I'm going to fight it pal. This is the bullshit of some little guy who thinks that somehow, we Americans should take his view into consideration. We don't. We won't. We shouldn't. If you guys have too much of a problem with us, you're more than welcome to have a little throwdown with us. We'll just use your lands and territories to benefit the American people over your warped and destroyed bodies and buildings. War is a tool. It's a solution. Killing is effective, as it eliminates threats. Who can oppose you after you annihilated them. We don't even need to go to war. We just need to find the trouble population or country and send a few tomahawks their way, watch their capital blow up, and leave with a warning that they're screwing with the wrong people.