|
Post by Iakus on Sept 25, 2017 11:33:08 GMT -6
Watched it. What can I say? This is the biggest hack-job since Eragon. What they did was take the first Captain America movie and copy it. Then mixed it up here and there so "nobody would notice". Chris Pine plays Captain America (all the way up to sacrifice via plane) + Peggy Carter - the superpowers. Gal Gadot plays the superpowers. David Thewlis plays Red Skull. It had better humor than Captain America, though. Robin Wright was excellent in it though. She would have made a perfect Wonder Woman 10+ years ago for sure. Gal Gadot....She is the new Brigitte Nielsen. Pretty face with no acting ability. 3/10 I disagree, these are two completely different movies. Sure, they share some similarities, like both taking place during a World War, but both heroes were created around the same time (1941, to be precise) so their involvement in the war was unavoidable (moreso Cap than Wonder Woman). If anything, the setting for Wonder Woman was changed to World War I from its original World War II. Both movies having a team around the leads? That's practically every (old) war movie ever, particularly when there's some top secret mission they must undertake (Guns of Navarone, Cockleshell Heroes, Dirty Dozen, Kelly's Heroes, etc.). And what's Peggy Carter's connection to Cap's powers? Tangential at best since the formula was developed by Stanley Tucci's character and his gear made by Tony's father. On Pine's Trevor resembling Evans' Rogers, sure, I can see that to some extent (beyond both characters pulling the sacrifice card aboard a plane full of bombs). Not sure what you mean by Ares and Red Skull being the same. If you mean it in the sense that Skull is Cap's mirror in the same way Ares is Diana's (product of the same formula on the one hand, demigods on the other) then yes, I agree. However, Diana's connection to the Gods is thoroughly established in the comics, whether your take is the pre or post-New 52 origin (the movie goes with the New 52 origin). The characters and their motivations are also completely different. Cap has a set of principles that he sticks with through thick and thin. His goal is clear and he never wavers from that goal. At the beginning, Diana is extremely confident about her mission to kill Ares and how that'll put an end to the war but, throughout the movie, her beliefs about humanity are challenged at every turn, making her wonder whether mankind deserves to be saved at all. There is a growth in her character that Steve Rogers' Cap never goes through. I could go on but I can't agree with a below-average rating, certainly not on par with Eragon. Can you really say the acting in this movie was as bad as in Eragon? Were the visual effects as terrible, the story so uninspired? I can't in good conscience make that comparison. Besides, Captain America is, in itself, a copy of the Marvel-movie template but that's a discussion for another time. I think most of the comparisons revolve around the similarity between Steve Trevor and Steve Rogers. Besides the name, both are blonde, blue-eyed American soldiers played by actors named "Chris". Both are stalwart patriots determined to do the right thing, no matter what. Both end up sacrificing themselves in a plane to prevent the German doomsday weapon from being unleashed. The difference, of course, is that Rogers was a costumed superhero and Trevor was not. And Trevor was also somewhat less idealistic about being able to save everyone.
|
|