I did too but I know a better movie when I watch it Mr. Easily Offended esq.. Reread what I said.
Did you prefer The prequels to 7?
Do you make a constant effort to inform people of such things to further your own ego?
If yes to both, then you indeed are.

The prequels have some merit to them, but alot of the good aspects are either EU stuff, Clone Wars, or completely unintentional on Lucas' part.

In summary

Skimmed it.
Pretty much said what I already knew.

Oh thats rich coming from you.

As for prefering the prequels over 7, in some ways I did.

Lol, neither did I at first.

I am intrigued about your point of view.
What did you prefer about the prequels?

Fair enough.

Personally, I liked Palpatine's schemes but many people found it to be the most boring aspect of the prequels.

These are the same twats who list Furious 7 or Harry Potter and Fire-thing of Whatever in their top 3 all-time flicks. Idiots.

Any reasonable, grown adult audience member can see & hear clearly that Ewan McGregor & Ian McDiarmid are easily the best thing about the prequels. These performances, these characters' arcs are well done (despite a cheesy line or silly facial expression here or there)

The Sidious/Palpatine villain in particular, since his exact machinations were only lightly eluded to in the OT. He is a great antagonist, and he pulls no punches, has no remorse or regret. This role could only be played by the actor who laid the foundation for this build-up in ep. 5 & 6. Sir Ian McDiarmid. Palpatine is the classic "actor playing an actor" role, which is relished by thespians because of the subtlety and immersion required to pull off a believable performance. He had to simultaneously seem malevolent, seductive, paternal, authoritative, calculating & ruthless. A master of his craft.