Deleted
I have made 0 posts
Right now I'm Offline
I joined January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 16:42:54 GMT -6
Thousands of years of patriarchal culture that have made the sexes at constant conflict with one another? I mean, this goes back to Chaucer where his Wife of Bath, Franklin's, Knight's, and Merchant's tales all take different approaches to the institution and economy of marriage. In all save the Franklin's tale, one of the main points of focus is the general miscommunication and conflict between the sexes.
Now, I won't say that this is all patriarchal discourse, obviously biological elements are to be factored in but I'm no scientist so it's outside my field of speciality.
But let's take for example, a discussion on sex - the physical act etc.
Patriarchy demands of men that we are to be dominant, physical, empowering as opposed to women who are to be quiet and subservient. These notions of masculinity and femininity have evolved and therefore blurred throughout our times thanks to the dreaded third wave but walk into a clothes store today and you still get the picture.
Now don't bullshit me and say that it isn't true today, we've been categorising things by gender since our very concept of gender was realised. Sure, we outgrow things, but our primary socialisation will stick with us until we die. Institutions still push these principles, they've gotten better at it, but hey... look at these perfume ads we still get.
The man's body is strong, he dives into the water without care and the woman follows in pursuit. He walks the ladder first and assists her only to passionately embrace her as she's sucked in-
Oh god I'm writing porn. You get the point.
The symbol of the lotus is ingrained with birth and purity, and what's more pure than freaking birth? Ironically her purity clashes with her obvious objectification. It seems that even when she is the subject of the commercial, she is automatically made object with her lotus prison which she never leaves even as it blossoms.
But like I say, these ads are getting better
Note how the male retains his masculine image but is soon seduced and emasculated, his phallus (the arrow) literally torn by feminine power who walks away after she is satisfied, the phallus still in hand because she is sexually free to do what she desires, man in this ad becomes the object, the other.
But even if they have empowered her, the roles remain the same. Women are feminine, beautiful, deadly in their seductions and graceful. Though they have empowered the image of woman, the ad suggests no other alternative.
And this is the problem.
Going back to sex, see now that our approaches are different. Men are the 'key' and women are the 'lock', the metaphor stems from this idea that women are to be mastered and their mastery is a result of the man's skill at dominance. Slut shaming and the recurring desire for purity and chastity for females generally make them reserved with sex, and even when they grow out of this the stigma is still present.
I mean, for one this daddy's girl culture where a daughter "won't date" is still prevalent. Of course she'll date, but being put underneath that spotlight enforces the gendered myth of woman. It seriously is hard to break out of these roles completely and embrace your own image. Whether you're a guy or a girl.
I'm a student living with four of the most beautiful girls I've ever come to know and we talk about sex freely. However, how they are seen by others if they are to be "promiscuous" and "sleep around" is still a subject to be worried about. Their image must still be retained.
Though we've gone far from what the ideal for women was, elements of this are still to be found. You can never really slut shame a guy, his apparent status as a 'fuckboy' never hinders his pursuit for sexual partners because in the end, sex is something we want to have. But with patriarchy still being a thing, a woman's advances are seen as sultry, a man's is natural because "boys will be boys".
Yet the language is still the same.
"All men are the same" is exactly what "Bitches ain't nothin' but hoes and tricks" means.
I'm focusing on women here because they've been dealt the shitty hand in the patriarchy game, but this goes for men just as well. The recent attention to Male Suicide for one is a great step towards bridging this gap. Lots of shit (most of it ill informed) is said about the third wave of feminism, but if any criticism is to given is its lack of mainstream attention to the subject of toxic masculinity.
Bridging this gap can only be a half n half thing. The quicker these bullshit ideas of chivalry and the need for power or superiority on 'male subjects' like the sciences are erased the quicker we come to an understanding of eachother.
Sorry for going into this tangent, but it's the easiest way to fully explain some of the key points of this discussion. Hell, I've cut this short because I could've gone for a whiiiiiiiiiiiile.
Simply being that our miscommunication comes from this cultural divide of gender roles rather than something inherent. My 'understanding' of women became a lot clearer once I realised that some of their bs was because of this role they've placed themselves in/been placed in. Same as us dudes.
We gotta make an effort to make communication easier.
/rant.
|
|