|
Post by ObserverStatus on Aug 27, 2015 16:10:42 GMT -6
I'm not quite sure what to make of The Donald. One theory I've heard is that he's a false flag candidate supporting Hillarly Clinton. This sort of makes sense seeing how far to the left of the rest of the field he has been over the years on certain issues. He supported universal healthcare. He opposed cuts to all entitlements. He opposed the second Iraq war from the beginning. He's supported the Clintons in the past. It kinda makes sense, in 1992, another conservative businessman ran as a third party candidate and helped another Bush lose to another Clinton. As George Lucas once said, "Again, it's like poetry so that they rhyme. Every stanza kinda rhymes with the last one. Hopefully it will work." Trouble with this theory, is it requires you to believe that either the Clintons have the means to compensate him for everything he's sacrificed to make it this far, or he's supporting her for selfless reasons. Only other possibility I can think of that would explain his recent behavior would be that he is suffering from the same sort of fame induced neurodegeneration that other celebrities have suffered from over the years, such as Miley Cyrus and Justin Bieber. When I see Donald Trump making inflammatory remarks like the ones that got him fired from NBC, and the ones that have lead every Spanish speaking business partner he has ever worked with cut ties with him, I cannot help but to recall the time Miley Cyrus drew attention to herself by dry humping a foam finger, and the time Justin Bieber publicly urinated into a mop bucket while crying "Fuck Bill Clinton!" or the time Charlie Sheen gave that whole speech about tigerblood or something. My point is, if The Donald isn't a false flag candidate working for Clinton, we should all be concerned by his recent self destructive behavior. True I have my concerns about him being a plant as well but for me immigration is the forefront and I'm willing to him give a chance. Plus there's really no other person I can get behind since Rand became a bit to inconsistent now a days. Funny you should mention the guys self destructive nature its that reason he is leading in polls last time I checked he has over 40% which is amazing since I believe no other candidate has had number that high. I meant that his behavior is destructive to his own finances, not his political career. His support amongst Republicans is irrelevant at this point. He may have 40% support amongst Republicans, but 55% of Republicans say that they will not vote to nominate him under any circumstances. Eventually, the anyone but Trump crowd will all gather around either Bush, Walker, or Rubio. Doesn't matter which one, Trump isn't going to get the nomination. As for Paul, I can see what you mean. I wanted to like him, given his positions on defense and privacy, but I just can't look past how close he's become to the likes of Cliven Bundy and those Oathkeeper assclowns.
|
|