|
Post by Rawgrim on May 31, 2017 2:34:04 GMT -6
Obligate to do it? No. But it certainly would help. Way more muslims are being killed by extremists than others. They are suffering the bulk of the damage. I am sure they want it to stop too. Both the Koran and the Bible speak of love and respect, but both of them also say that you should kill infidels, witches and lots of other stuff. Means they are both shit. Who would it help? And who should they say it too? Again, it is the presumption that generally all muslims condone's these attacks that is the problem. They need to be invited into the political debate, not be apologists for something they have nothing to do with. If I were a muslim I would feel downright hurt, not just because people commit these awful acts in the name of a religion I beleive in, but also because my fellow citizens feel that I as a muslim have a special obligation. It is absurd. It is not Islam that is brainwashing these people, it is the actions of these extremists that does, same with Breivik. Yes. Get muslim leaders into debates and all kinds of stuff. Let them be heard. Counter the arguments and the brainwashing the extremists are using at every turn. In a 2007 Pew Research poll in response to a question on whether suicide bombing and other forms of violence against civilian targets to defend Islam could be justified,[31] in Europe: (36 vs 64) 64% of Muslims in France believed it could never be justified, 19% believed it could be justified rarely, 10% sometimes, and 6% thought it could be justified often. (30 vs 70) 70% of Muslims in Britain believed it could never be justified, 9% believed it could be justified rarely, 12% sometimes, and 3% thought it could be justified often. (17 vs 83) 83% of Muslims in Germany believed it could never be justified, 6% believed it could be justified rarely, 6% sometimes, and 1% thought it could be justified often. (31 vs 69) 69% of Muslims in Spain believed it could never be justified, 9% believed it could be justified rarely, 10% sometimes, and 6% thought it could be justified often. In mainly Muslim countries: (55 vs 45) 45% of Muslims in Egypt believed it could never be justified, 25% believed it could be justified rarely, 20% sometimes, and 8% thought it could be justified often. (39 vs 61) 61% of Muslims in Turkey believed it could never be justified, 9% believed it could be justified rarely, 14% sometimes, and 3% thought it could be justified often. (57 vs 43) 43% of Muslims in Jordan believed it could never be justified, 28% believed it could be justified rarely, 24% sometimes, and 5% thought it could be justified often. (72 vs 28) 28% of Muslims in Nigeria believed it could never be justified, 23% believed it could be justified rarely, 38% sometimes, and 8% thought it could be justified often. (31 vs 69) 69% of Muslims in Pakistan believed it could never be justified, 8% believed it could be justified rarely, 7% sometimes, and 7% thought it could be justified often. (29 vs 71) 71% of Muslims in Indonesia believed it could never be justified, 18% believed it could be justified rarely, 8% sometimes, and 2% thought it could be justified often. Just some statistics. Kind of relevant. It is more than just a few extremists that condone terror. It is a larger problem than many believe. Yes it is Islam that is brainwashing people, in the sense that the Koran and verses from it is being used as the main arguments for extremism. It is the same kind of nutcase religious brainwashing we had in Europe a few centuries ago. Breivik didn't brainwash anyone, though. He went solo. Nobody has followed his nazi actions later on either. His actions didn't spark a hint of the "revolution" he was trying to make happen.
|
|