Ness
Rah's Piggy
Duchess of Liamsburgh
'A poem is never finished, it just stops moving'
I have made 3,765 posts
Right now I'm Offline
I joined August 2015
I've received 3,938 likes
My gender is Female
BSN Posts 3,322
|
Post by Ness on Oct 20, 2016 11:07:49 GMT -6
“A goal for us was to make something that kind of contested the notion of animation being a genre, and one for children specifically,” “We really wanted to make something that was a little bit more adult in the thematic choices, and show that animation could be a medium to tell any sort of story.”Well... they sure managed that. Easy enough to forget sometimes, but that's very much a viewpoint plenty still have. Animation for kids. Its such a vicious cycle to get out of as well. If you break assumed convention, then that's financial risk. So its always nice seeing a little passion project not restricted by such things attempting to help break the mold. Hopefully all that respect its getting on the thumbnail there amounts to some impact! For my two pence, I'd say its pretty powerful stuff. One thing I'd say that isn't portrayed too often in animation is actual guilt. Probably for good reason, at least based on the above assumptions about animation for children. Its a heck of a painful concept to approach and grapple with. On the one hand, you probably get a lot of perceived guilt, guilt portrayed in such a way as a character blaming themselves for something that the audience can just as easily see them not being culpable of, and are perhaps actively encouraged to do so having been provided with evidence to the contrary. Cue other cast members reassurance's that 'there's nothing they could have done', said character will likely come to terms with said event, and they move on.
Here there is no cast, just one man who, tragically, looks to have had no such assurances and has been weighed upon by his 'mistakes' heavily for years.
And as for his culpability, only his mistakes are shown, there's no context provided as to whether he was accustomed to carriage driving, or if he was familiar with firearms, or if he was of a quick enough wit to have avoided that situation entirely. Indeed, his own actions indirectly caused his father's death, and the only words spoken by the father are cries for help and him placing trust in his son. There's nothing really shown to suggest if he should or shouldn't feel guilty, but its plain as day to see why he does.
As it is, its a brief summary, but one in the way guilt does tend to operate. It remember's only what could have gone differently, the pivotal moments... And it also remembers the reason why those mistakes were so disastrous in the first place and the guilt so heavy, because of what was lost.
Revisiting where the chase concluded, he finds it mostly the same as it was, which is on point symbolism. You can't change the past. The dust over it's remains may thicken and become an even uglier sight to bear in time, but equally it needn't be all consuming. Which to me is what the short is about. Its not that the man returned to the scene to die, but that he came back to face the past and attempt to come to terms with it. He evaluates his role in things, and while initially choosing to blame himself and entertain the idea of ending that train of thought entirely, in doing so he discovers that life is fragile, and just how easy it was in such a perilous situation (both his current frame of mind and the carriage chase) to have almost cast his own life away on accident, let alone how easy it may have been to have failed somebody else. And then he's reminded of his own reasons for living still, the picture in the pocket watch. It survived all that time, just like his own more positive memories, and the potential for future ones.
And the nicer implication of course being that he is able to move on. The watch ticks again for the first time since his father's death, which I needn't note the symbolism of. X)
But that's just what I took from it.
Definitely a fantastic little thing. Totally didn't cause tears
And such a great soundtrack too!
|
|