This is what the ocean will do because of massive amounts of CO2 that's getting absorbed into it btw guys.

All the solar and wind power fads, nuclear energy, organic produce and blabbering on about climate change and emissions (which data shows is sketchy) makes no difference. They're all smoke and mirrors and as much as the climate change lobby may push that things can be fixed, it can't be. Renewable energy will do fuck all, the Paris climate talks are a waste, even if all nations agreed to reduce emissions it'd make no difference.

I may as well point out the elephant in the room, population. 7 billion humans. At the current rate of growth this is unsustainable, as unpalatable as it may be population control needs to be instituted, aid money to the third world curtailed and Gov implementing social security systems which discourage more than 2 children being born per couple.

This is the Malthusian T/rap that we face. The Economist Thomas Robert Malthus in the late 18th Century theorised that a population would eventually outstrip the ability of the environment in which it lived to support it, over population would then be corrected by famine, disease, starvation and war causing population decline to bring the population back within sustainable levels. Technological advancement has allowed our species to stave of the Malthusian Hole, but it is inevitable, it will happen eventually we've simply been living on borrowed time.

Now no politician would ever grasp such a thistle as it's not popular or and doesn't come into feel good politics, it is however practical and the one way out. Everything else is dust in the wind.

Edit:

T/rap, really T/rap is censored? who's dumb arse idea was that? Of all the stupid shit that goes on round here this one has got to be towards the top.  

I may as well point out the elephant in the room, population. 7 billion humans. At the current rate of growth this is unsustainable, as unpalatable as it may be population control needs to be instituted, aid money to the third world curtailed and Gov implementing social security systems which discourage more than 2 children being born per couple.

I have some doubts about this. The top six contributors to global emissions (China, Japan, the US, Russia, the EU, India and Japan) account for 70% of the world's emissions; these aren't exactly what you'd call third world nations. Meanwhile, a child born in the US will, over the course of his lifetime, contribute almost fifty times more to the greenhouse effect than one born in, say, Ghana.

I was also wondering about the whole 'H/ole' thing; I have no idea why it would replace that word with "Hole" of all things.

Start with the weaboos!

Start with the weaboos! 

All the solar and wind power fads, nuclear energy, organic produce and blabbering on about climate change and emissions (which data shows is sketchy) makes no difference. They're all smoke and mirrors and as much as the climate change lobby may push that things can be fixed, it can't be. Renewable energy will do fuck all, the Paris climate talks are a waste, even if all nations agreed to reduce emissions it'd make no difference.

I may as well point out the elephant in the room, population. 7 billion humans. At the current rate of growth this is unsustainable, as unpalatable as it may be population control needs to be instituted, aid money to the third world curtailed and Gov implementing social security systems which discourage more than 2 children being born per couple.

This is the Malthusian Hole that we face. The Economist Thomas Robert Malthus in the late 18th Century theorised that a population would eventually outstrip the ability of the environment in which it lived to support it, over population would then be corrected by famine, disease, starvation and war causing population decline to bring the population back within sustainable levels. Technological advancement has allowed our species to stave of the Malthusian Hole[b/], but it is inevitable, it will happen eventually we've simply been living on borrowed time.

Now no politician would ever grasp such a thistle as it's not popular or and doesn't come into feel good politics, it is however practical and the one way out. Everything else is dust in the wind.

Edit:

Hole, really Hole is censored? who's dumb arse idea was that? Of all the stupid shit that goes on round here this one has got to be towards the top.  

Edit:

If you're going to edit my posts again, it's a ridiculous filter and editing it to enforce it in this discussion is utterly asinine and down right dense. 

Tornado farms could also be a good renewable energy source. Create regulated artificial tornadoes in a robust area thus driving multiple turbines.

Also, create a system to where people have the pay for the carbon dioxide that they generate and then use that money for further research and engineering for renewables.